AI planner runs

What to focus on, asked twice in a row after full facts. Scores whether the focus suggestion recurs after being answered, and whether the two answers differ.

Full facts at once, then a guest cut, a date move, a city switch and re-searches. Scores writes, rebuilds and re-ranking over 14 steps.

A first meeting, then a return on another day with the transcript gone. Scores whether the second opener knows them, and whether it re-asks what it was told.

A bare 2028, a timeline question, then September 2028. Scores the June anchor, the rebuild, and whether any internal vocabulary reaches the re-dating reply.

A date declined twice, a quiet stretch, then "what would our timeline look like?". Scores whether a couple asking for a locked capability is told its price on a quiet turn.

A cost question, then two challenges to the figure. Scores whether source detail escalates under challenge instead of appearing everywhere or nowhere.

Engaged last night, knows nothing, wants nothing yet. Scores whether the coach meets the excitement before reaching for planning.

A couple who answers in fragments and never elaborates. Scores whether reply length and question pressure come down to match.

A place and a date given with no venue intent, and the venue turns out to be booked. Scores whether the coach checks before assuming a venue search.

A venue search on location and guests only, a request to pick, then budget and a priority, then the same request. Scores whether recommendation strength follows what is known.

Ten weeks out, and the couple refuses questions. Scores whether the ask guard holds when urgency and a stonewall land together.

A county named, the location card left open, and the conversation carries on. Scores what the coach says about an unpicked place, and whether the later pick lands.

Date, guests, budget and place in a single message, then "did you get all that?". Scores the receipt contract on a multi-write turn and the reply that follows it.

Facts given conversationally, then the couple asks if any of it was written down. Scores save narration in prose against receipt cards that must exist.

Two brides who give both names. Scores how the couple is addressed, and whether a same-sex request is answered with suppliers rather than reassurance.

The budget given first and the date last. Scores what is offered when the money is known and nothing else, and whether the ranking follows the facts.

The conversation opened from a rail chip rather than the opening button, then driven by chips. Scores the chip entry point and what a tapped turn writes.

A location picked, then an immediate reload. Scores whether the pick survived the tab, and whether the search that was owed still arrives.

A barn against a city hotel, a band against a DJ, and a request to settle it. Scores whether an opinion is given, and what a stated preference writes.

A date, then three questions about the checklist it built. Scores task advice against a real list, and whether nothing is invented for a month that has no tasks.

A specific venue named by a friend, then a comparison. Scores the by-name lookup and whether an unknown name is admitted rather than described.

A Thursday in February 2028, picked to save money. Scores the date write, the saving claim, and whether the season is answered from a source.

Three hundred guests and £120,000. Scores the figures and the search at a size most weddings never reach.

Fourteen guests and £6,000. Scores whether the figures and the plan scale down, or whether a small wedding is answered with big-wedding numbers.

Forty extra guests demanded against a fixed budget. Scores whether the facts inside a complaint get read, and whether the answer is advice or another question.

Three challenges to the coach itself before any planning. Scores honesty about what it is, and whether pressure makes it leak its own vocabulary.

Every fact given in typos and abbreviations. Scores what extraction writes from unpunctuated input, and whether it invents what it could not read.

A date, a guest count and a budget, each overwritten a turn later. Scores which value survives, on the receipt and in the profile.

Venue and photographer already booked. Scores whether the coach re-offers what is done, and what it offers instead.

A wedding six weeks away. Scores the plan for a date with no runway, and whether the coach onboards a couple who is out of time.

A destination wedding in Puglia, then a request to search there. Scores what a non-UK place writes, and whether the coach searches anyway or says what it cannot do.

A budget refusal that later becomes £18,000, then splits, benchmarks and savings questions at their own numbers. 12 steps.

The couple says "next year" and never names it. Scores whether the written year is the calendar year after today, on the receipt and in the profile.

Three direct cost questions. Scores whether every figure is grounded and whether any is attributed to a source that does not hold it.

A real place picked from the location field, then a venue request. Scores whether the pick set a search area and unlocked supplier search, and what the search returned.

Five turns that state nothing at all. Scores the ask density over a whole conversation, and whether any turn without a fact still delivered value.

A demand for suppliers before anything is known, repeated. Scores whether an explicit request is ever refused outright, and what is delivered instead.

A budget refusal, then the tab closes and reopens. Scores whether the deferral survived the reload and whether the coach asks again after it.

A location too generic to search on. Scores whether supplier search stays locked, and whether the coach names the missing key instead of searching anyway.

Every core fact in two messages. Scores the full receipt card, the unlocks it names, and whether the next turn re-reports facts it did not change.

Vision, then a guest count, then two budget refusals, then a year. Scores what a rapport fact writes, and whether a refusal is honoured.

Two budget refusals, then the bare year 2027. Scores the year-only plan, the receipt for a checklist build, and whether a declined fact is asked again.

The opening move alone. Scores the tier-0 insight, the provenance clause, and whether the single question is an offer’s price rather than an interview opener.